
Most of college football's first week is in the books. A couple of intrastate battles commence later today. Kentucky travels to Louisville and Colorado State visits Colorado. And Monday features Tennessee heading to sunny California to face off with UCLA.
But for this season's first edition of Phi Bloga Recapa we've netted enough grist for the mill from Saturday's games. A couple of upsets complete with a Michigan loss, but nothing on the level of Appalachian State's upset, the fitting inaugural for 2007's wild season.
Anyway, here's a look around blogfrica for reactions to Saturday's biggest games.
East Carolina 27 Virginia Tech 22. Beat writer Kyle Tucker at his Hampton Roads blog says:
Wow. Stunner today, huh? I’m not necessarily shocked that East Carolina won. Definitely surprised by HOW the Pirates won. They beat Beamer with Beamerball.
It looked like Tech’s baby-faced team would slip out of here – Charlotte’s Bank of America Stadium – with a win despite their many blunders. The kids (and some vets) made mistakes, but were on the verge of a typical Tech win: just enough offense and big plays from the D and special teams.
Then the young Hokies defense wilted, the once-again-uncertain O-line struggled and Tech gave up a disastrous play in the kicking game. In a snap, the air went of the Hokies’ balloon.
Bowling Green 27 Pittsburgh 17. The CriticalFanatic at FanIQ says:
No more excuses for Wanny, after this afternoon's 27-17 loss to Bowling Green. It's Big East title or find a new coordinator job in the NFL.
The Falcons set up to stuff LeSean McCoy, a preseason Heisman Trophy candidate and held him to 71 yards rushing. He got his touchdown early, but Pitt couldn't move late when they needed to. Not all the blame falls on McCoy however, Wannstedt kept the playcalling conservative and for that, his Panthers didn't score in the game's final 30 minutes.
Pittsburgh only gained 46 yards rushing in the final three quarters... against a MAC team. My apologies for picking the Panthers to start out 9-1. New rule: if Wannstedt is coach, don't expect too much in the way of efficient offense.
Utah 25 Michigan 23. Lya Wodraska at the Utes Blog says:
We can analyze this one all week, but general impressions were guys like Nai Fotu and Paul Kruger delivered some big hits when needed, and all those direct snaps the Utes have been working on really paid off with Matt Asiata. He is a bulldozer of a player.
California 38 Michigan State 31. Contributor Tony at Bears Necessity says:
Kevin Riley = Stud
You can’t argue with 17/24, 202 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs. And I’d like to point out that Riley threw another one of those heart-stopping passes with multiple dudes hanging about his waist and legs. As long as he keeps completing them, I say go for it. I’ll promptly change my mind the first time a defender picks one off (as would happen if it were ANY OTHER QB doing such an inherently foolish thing).
Nate Longshore = Cursed
I think we may have just witnessed Nate’s last snaps in a Cal uni outside of garbage time or emergency situations. It’s a horrible thing to write because I sincerely believe Longshore is a great QB, a solid dude, and an excellent leader. And there’s no arguing around what the guy delivered in 2006. But the egg is cracked. Something isn’t right. I just can’t believe, after dwelling all this time on those game-killing picks he threw last season, he came out and threw two bad picks in his first five throws. I’d like to say I think he can turn it around, but I think that window has now, finally, shut.
Missouri 52 Illinois 42. Brandon at Sleepy at 8:30 says:
It followed the same formula as last year: Game is close at first, Mizzou Offense comes out firing, Mizzou Defense comes out stout, Mizzou pulls away at halftime, Mizzou Defense lets Illinois back in the game, Mizzou almost blows huge lead, Mizzou Offense can’t move the ball to ice the game, Mizzou Defense bails out Mizzou Offense. Mizzou wins a game that never should’ve been as close as it was. Mizzou leaves game with major questions.




























